|
We are all concerned about the safety of our water. The following report will
give you the straight facts about Chromium VI.
1. The California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set the maximum
contaminant level for total chromium at 50 parts per billion.
2. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has set the Public
Health Goal at 2.5 parts per billion total chromium and .2 parts per billion for
chrom VI based on the assumption that chrom VI would be 7.2 % of total chromium.
They set this low level based on the knowledge that chrom VI causes cancer and
has mutagenic capabilities.
3. Recently both agencies became aware that chrom VI could actually be as
high as 50-100% of total chromium.
4. The US Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco stated that they are
considering setting the maximum contamination down to 20 parts per billion later
this year. (Groundwater Resources Association of California (GRAC) symposium
January 25,2001).
5. Earlier this year, it was estimated that some 87 groundwater wells in the
East San Fernando Valley were contaminated with Chromium IV; some above state
and federal maximum contaminant levels. At the GRAC symposium officials said
that over 250 groundwater wells in the East San Fernando Valley were
contaminated and that chrom VI had migrated into superfund sights.
6. Late last year, LA Supervisor Michael Antonovich became very worried about
chrom VI and asked Dr. Shindy, the Deputy Director of Environmental Toxicology
Bureau at the Los Angeles County Agricultural Department of Weights and
Measures, to do a 30-day study of chrom VI at 110 facilities in 71 cities county
wide. This would be the first time it was tested at the faucet. The results were
that facilities county wide tested positive for chromium VI.
While the debate rages on between the California agencies; they all agree
that more testing needs to be done to better understand how much it will take to
make a person sick. They know that chrom VI causes cancer and has mutagenic
capabilities, yet these agencies continue to tell the public that the water is
safe to drink. How can they guarantee your safety if they don’t know at what
level you could be impacted?
Since the officials can’t tell me at what level it becomes lethal, I would
prefer to walk on the side of caution and not drink it at all. Erin Brockovich
posed the question late last year at a public hearing; "Why would you want
to drink poison?"
Dr. Joseph K. Lyou, the Director of Programs for the California League of
Conservation Voters Education Fund, Communities for a Better Environment, Legal
Issues for Citizen and Environmental Groups brought up the following questions:
Is it safe? Will my family be harmed? Who will guarantee my safety? How did this
happen? What is the government going to do about it? Will the problem be solved?
Accountability must be acknowledged.
I want to leave you with these two little questions. What does a frog do if
you throw him in a pot of boiling water? He jumps out. What does a frog do if
you dump him in a pot of cool water and then you slowly bring it to a boil? He
just sits there and when he discovers what is happening, it’s simply too late.
—Jude Margolis, 323-644-1961, judemargolis@aol.com
|