I’ve just poured you a glass of
water. Don’t worry. It’s mountain spring water. But wait. Don’t
drink yet. I’m just going to place one drop of this clear liquid into
your glass. What is it? It is a fluid that has been through the Tillman
Water Reclamation Process. What’s that, you ask? It’s a very
expensive project, about $55 million so far. You’re not saying,
"Yes." Okay, the whole truth? It started as raw sewage from
all over Los Angeles. Yes, from toilets, hospitals and industries. It’s
sewage from everything that gets dumped into the sewers.
You don’t want just one drop in all that water? Maybe if I told you
that the LADWP has already spent the $55 million from the state and
federal government, you would feel more comfortable. No? That’s a lot
of money. What do you mean, "Has the process been tested?" Of
course. No independent studies but the DWP’s own experts say it’s
okay, that we get reclaimed water now.
You DO trust the DWP and all their experts, don’t you? I see you’re
starting to loosen up. Good. I do, however, have to tell you that by
allowing me to add this drop of filtered raw sewage to your drinking
water, you are participating in a medical experiment.
Not thirsty anymore? You want more information, do you? Okay, here’s
the deal: So far technology does not exist to remove some chemicals from
the water. Just recently a story broke in the L.A. Times about Chromium
6 levels in our existing drinking water. That’s just one that has
reached our consciousness because of the Erin Brockovich story. In a
1998 study, Issues in Potable Reuse: The Viability of Augmenting
Drinking Water Supplies With Reclaimed Water, they describe the
process this way: "…the intentional augmentation of a community’s
raw water supply with treated municipal wastewater." The scientists
who compiled the data for this study ask this simple question right up
front, "Do we know enough to establish criteria by which treated
wastewater can be judged suitable for human consumption?"
I suggest that if technology doesn’t exist to pull Chromium 6 out
of the drinking water, then how can we know for certain that the many
known and unknown chemicals that are being flushed today will be gone
tomorrow? The word for these chemicals is "toxins". In a few
years after the beginning of this project, it is estimated that 2% of
our water will be swapped with treated raw sewage. This toxic soup may
or may not be healthy for us even at a low dose.
You want the rest of the plan? Once this raw sewage has gone through
the Tillman experience, it must be chlorinated heavily to remove the
nitrogen that Tillman is not yet able to remove. Then the
"water" is delivered to the spreading grounds near Hanson Dam
and in Tujunga. From there it will seep down, down, down through many
layers of earth. This journey through God’s own filtration plant,
according to the DWP will take 5 years. Yet some other recent studies
not connected with DWP say this is not correct. The other sources
describe the journey as much quicker saying that the distance between
the spreading fields and the underground water supply is not as far as
the DWP claims. A shorter experience in the earth means not as much of
nature’s cleansing will go on. Who should we believe? Anyway, the DWP
says they will drill several testing wells. The problem comes if they
don’t like what they see that is still in the water. Once the
"water" reaches the spreading grounds, there is no turning
back. But the testing seems like a good idea – knowledge is power
after all.
When the journey through the earth is complete, the water now diluted
in our underground aquifers must be chlorinated again. How can only 2%
of the water receive this chlorination? What a silly question. It ALL
must be chlorinated. That’s 2 chlorination processes. You don’t
really want to know what scientists are learning about chlorine. If you
do, read Pandora’s Poison by Thornton.
The unknowns are great. The likelihood of human error exists. At the
end of the day, who will want to be the DWP employee making this phone
call: "Hello, is this Joe in quality control? Uh, yeah, Joe, this
is Sam at Tillman. We may have a little problem here. The Chromium 6 has
gone up a bit over the standards. Yeah, and there’s some radio active
isotopes levels that are way off the charts. And there’s more but let’s
start there. No, I don’t know how long these readings have been like
this. I’m just filling in for Fred. He’s out with another one of his
headaches. What should I do?"
In this scenario anything is possible because of the
consequences: The public’s confidence in their government and the DWP
would plummet. The people would panic. All the aquifers would have to be
closed. The whole world would be laughing at L.A. Our water would have
to come from outside the area depleting other natural resources. The
cost in time and money in an effort to find a way to clean up or
sanitize our water would be staggering. You would pay the price in tax
hikes, assessments, increased water cost, lower property value and
maybe, just maybe your life.
Yes, this is an experiment. There is no mystery behind the
veil that has hung over this project for years. The material from the
DWP that was sent to only a few homes states clearly that the water
would go to keep parks clean and engines in plants cool. Would the
Federal and State government have parted with $55 million if they knew
the water was going into our taps? The City Council was not given a
clear picture of this when the project was presented to them for their
approval.
It wasn’t until May that the LADWP came clean, Joel Wachs went
ballistic, Senator Alarcon hit the roof and the DWP was ordered to do 15
workshops to inform the public. At that time, Tom LaBonge, former
special assistant to Mayor Riordan was sent to be the public relations
guy for the DWP.
There may be a chance to stop this. "What about all that money?
The project is ready to go online!" Fine, let’s go forward with
the project, just don’t put it in the drinking water. We need to keep
that as pure as we can. And keep it away from agriculture because we
depend on that for our health as well.
Our children, the elderly and those with immune deficiencies will be
the canaries in the DWP’s coal mine.
What can you do about it? When you receive information through a
flyer on your doorstep, on a card in your mail box, in the newspaper or
on the radio telling you about a hearing on this issue, respond! Drop
what you’re doing. Do this for yourself, the young, the old and ones
with weak immune systems. Go to the hearing. Let City Hall wonder what
to do with this mass of outraged humanity. Make sure they do for you
what you have paid them to do: Demonstrate concern for the safety of the
people of Los Angeles.
We will all be drinking this water. Everyone will be exposed
at one time or another whether one can afford bottled water or not. When
you brush your teeth, wash your dishes, take a shower, swim, or wash
your fruits and vegetables. Even if you buy organic produce to eliminate
chemicals and pesticides, you will be putting toxins back on them. You
will be a recipient when you are out to dinner or it will come in a
pitcher of water given to you at your bedside in the hospital.
If we allow this, we will be paying the DWP at inflated rates for the
dubious honor of participating in a medical experiment.
The Coalition Against Toilet to Tap (CATT) has been working non-stop
to get this message to the people. They need your help. A letter to each
council office is where to start (see Access on page 20). If you
have any time or energy or resources to volunteer, call CATT
323-644-1961 or send e-mail to