|
(This
article was the lead front page article in the New York Press on April
22, 2003.)
By Alexander
Zaitchik
Fran Reichenbach
ripped off the Village Voice and she knows it. When the
51-year-old started her Hollywood-area community newspaper in 1998, she
lifted the blue and white rectangular design of the Voice logo
and simply replaced "Village" with "Beachwood," her
L.A. suburb best known for the filming of Invasion of the Body
Snatchers. She thought it would be cute if her little paper looked
like the big "Voice" back east.
So when she
received a classic cease-and-desist letter from the law offices of Kay
& Boose in January 2003, warning that the "horizontal and
vertical interplay" in her logo was too similar to that of its
famous Manhattan client, she didn’t deny it. Still, Reichenbach
thought the letter from Village Voice Media Inc. lawyer Marcia B. Paul
was a little heavy-handed. Her volunteer-staffed journal publishes four
times a year and has a circulation of 5000–almost nothing compared to
the Voice’s 250,000 issues per week. And Reichenbach resented
the accusation that the name of her Beachwood Canyon community rag was
"a calculated attempt to confuse" readers about the paper’s
ties to the Village Voice, three time zones away. Together with
changing the logo, the Voice Media lawyer strongly urged Reichenbach to
drop the article "the" from The Beachwood Voice.
She promptly did
both. The new design, unveiled in Beachwood Voice’s
just-released 24-page spring issue, looks nothing like the block logo of
the Village Voice. Rather, it resembles the wood-carved welcome
sign in front of a particularly unfortunate Southern Californian planned
community, with a stretched-out "Beachwood" atop a flowery
cursive "Voice" set against light violet. Voice Media lawyers
received the logo long before its debut.
But the New York
office of Kay & Boose soon decided the logo change wasn’t enough.
On Feb. 28, Reichenbach’s lawyer in Los Angeles received a second,
more pugnacious letter informing her that unless the word
"Voice" was dropped from the name, the Beachwood paper
"proceeds at its peril."
Why is the
Village Voice Media conglomerate telling a tiny publication 3000 miles
from New York that it lacks the legal right to be the titular
"voice" of its community? Do they honestly think that Beachwood
Voice is causing "confusion in the marketplace"?
The idea that
the country’s biggest alternative weekly is the only legitimate
"voice" in the country would be a good joke if the Voice legal
teams were smiling. But they’re not. In a publishing version of the
preemptive strike doctrine, Village Voice Media is scouring the country
for little "voices" to snuff out before they can
"threaten" their Goldman Sachs-backed brand name and
reputation. They apparently fear that columns such as "Doggie Owner
Crime Blotter," as found in the current issue of Beachwood Voice,
may be too easily confused with Village Voice fare such as
"La Dolce Musto."
Eliminating the
other "voices" of the world is going to take Voice Media and
friends a long time, no matter how deep their gilded alternative
pockets. The list of English-language publications using the word
"voice" in their titles continues to grow, and includes such
nascent alt-weekly empires as the Grenadian Voice, the Irish
Voice and the Warsaw Voice, among hundreds if not thousands
of others. The official newsletter of Maybee Village, MI (population
500), even has the temerity to insubordinately sport the exact title of
the Village Voice. Then there is the community website of
Warwick, NY, menacingly called the Voice of the Village.
The site
hasn’t been contacted by Voice Media legal teams yet, but
perhaps they should be on guard. Kay & Boose did not return phone
calls for this article, and so could not answer questions about who was
next in line for harassment.
The Voice’s
most recent successful intimidation of smaller papers came in 1998, when
then-owners Stern Publishing pulled a hat-trick and bullied three
minor-market weeklies into dropping "voice" from their
names. The Bloomington Voice was rechristened the Bloomington
Independent, the Tacoma Voice–the longest holdout among the
three–eventually agreed to become the Tacoma Reporter. The
Dayton Voice became the Dayton Impact Weekly, and is now the
Dayton City Paper (somehow avoiding threats by the nation’s
five other Association of Alternative Newspapers-listed City Papers.)
According to
Matt Youngmark, editor of the Tacoma Reporter, lawyers for Stern
Publishing pulled the same piecemeal intimidation tactics with his old Voice
as are currently being plied against Beachwood Voice. "We
changed the design when they told us to, and they even okayed the new
logo," he says. "Then they said they wanted a name change too.
Our first response was to design a Village Voice-style logo that
said ‘Go Fuck Yourself,’ but in the end we settled."
Stern Publishing
agreed to reimburse Youngmark for the cost of new promotional material
and distribution boxes.
"We would
have liked to fight them," says Youngmark, who had just launched
his biweekly Voice when the Stern Group’s lawyers contacted
him. "And I’d like to see someone else fight them now, because I
don’t think they have a leg to stand on. I mean, how many Reporters
and Times are there?"
That’s the
same question the owners of the Cape Cod Voice asked in the
summer of 2002, when Village Voice Media, represented by the Charlotte,
NC law firm of Moore & Van Allen, tried to frighten them out of
their new name. The seaside community magazine received the familiar
threatening letter after their fifth issue, claiming that the word
"voice" was a federally registered trademark and that any use
of it was "likely to cause mistake or confusion" between the
two publications.
"As you are
no doubt aware," the letter imperiously asserted, "The
Village Voice is a nationally and internationally known
newspaper…[that] currently enjoy[s] widespread recognition, goodwill
and fame."
The letter ends
with the following threat, which neatly captures the feel of
Ribbentrop’s generous offer to Czechoslovakia at Munich:
"We hope to
resolve this matter amicably, and, if you respond promptly, are willing
to work with you in an effort to minimize any disruption to your
company’s business. Our previous experience with the Bloomington
Voice, Dayton Voice and Tacoma Voice newspapers…
indicates that we can accomplish this goal."
This goal was
not shared by the owners of the Cape Cod Voice. They saw the
threat as pompous, illegal bullying, and decided to call Voice Media’s
bluff. They enlisted the Boston law firm of Hill & Barlow to argue
their case and made the dispute public. In its parry to the Voice’s
attack, the counsel for the Massachusetts-based Voice pointed out
the obvious differences in style and content between the two
publications: You write about New York prostitutes, we write about Cape
Cod lobstermen; you are free, we cost a dollar; you are weekly, we are
biweekly. Most crucially, they argued, the profusion of papers, journals
and magazines with the word "voice" in their titles
"suggests that your client’s ‘Voice’ mark suffers from a
profound lack of distinctiveness."
Voice Media
lawyers have yet to respond to the challenge, which would seem to
indicate that Village Voice Media knows their case to be bogus.
"Their strategy seems to be to pick the smallest and the weakest
links in a long chain of ‘voice’ publications," says Seth
Rolbein, editor and publisher of the Cape Cod Voice. "This
doesn’t say much about the ethical or legal strength of their
argument."
Another
publisher who stood up is Jamie Moses. Voice company lawyers
successfully forced his Buffalo, NY, Art Voice to change its logo
in 1991, when it had a readership of 10,000. When his circulation grew
and they returned six years later ordering him to change the name, he
wasn’t having it.
"At the
time other papers [in Dayton, Bloomington and Tacoma] were caving in to
the Voice," he says. "But they just didn’t have the
balls or the backbone to resist. I had too much invested in my brand
name to just give it up. I haven’t heard from them since."
Under current
trademark copyright laws, a mark such as "voice" must have
a common and logical connection to the product–in this case, community
newspapers–to be considered "generic." Judging from the
number of periodicals employing the word "voice," it would
seem to meet this test, and thus Voice Media’s claim to enjoy sole
rights at the exclusion of other newspapers is suspect at best.
"There are
standard terms that are used to describe newspapers," says Wendy
Seltzer, a copyright expert with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
"And none of these terms can be monopolized by a single entity.
[Voice Media] is trying to use trademark registration beyond where it
logically applies."
Nor can Village
Voice Media claim that other Voice publications are diluting
their brand or making it generic, because it was already generic when
Norman Mailer chose it as the name of the newborn paper in 1955. The
pile of papers with Voice in their title is deep and varied, and
at least one New York area paper–the Voice, published by the
Jewish Federation of Camden County–beat the Village Voice to
the trademark punch by 17 years.
There is of
course an ethical backdrop to all this, one made all the richer by the
ideological baggage still dragging behind the Village Voice name.
One among many Cape Cod residents who leapt to the Cape Cod Voice’s
defense was Mailer himself, who currently lives and writes in the artist
enclave of Provincetown. The tactics of Village Voice Media, he wrote,
are "enough to make one retch. It’s monstrous. It violates
everything The Village Voice stood for over the decades."
Veteran Voice
columnist Nat Hentoff agrees. "I think these attacks are
ridiculous," the civil liberties activist told New York Press.
"It’s embarrassing for the Village Voice, which was
founded in the name of free speech, to be strong-arming these little
papers. Tell me, is the word ‘newspaper’ copyrighted, too?"
Of course,
Village Voice Media’s seemingly out-of-character bullying isn’t
really out of character at all. The Village Voice and its sister
papers may be well-known for liberal politics, but this is also the age
of liberal empire. Village Voice Media, Inc. is now an alternative
newspaper octopus, and it aggressively protects and seeks to expand its
turf. This is especially true with regard to its flagship product and
most Michael Jordan-like brand name, the Village Voice. Village
Voice Media may be topped by veterans of the old-school alternative
press, but it’s now a business machine at heart, and lives according
to the logic of the beast–insufferable corporate lawyers, scare
tactics, activities that lead to antitrust investigations, all of it.
One can mourn
the days when the Voice represented the values and practices of
local, progressive, independent publishing, but they aren’t coming
back. As a paranoid, expansionist empire with far-flung investments,
Village Voice Media will continue to view any paper that pops up in the
U.S. as a possible competitor. This is true even when the threat of real
competition (or "confusion in the marketplace") is comical, as
in the case of the well-intentioned yet amateurish Beachwood Voice and
Voice Media’s west-coast mothership LA Weekly.
While
America’s original alternative newspaper has grown into something of a
straw bogeyman, it isn’t one that should unduly frighten other
"voices" in America’s publishing wilderness. The lesson of
the Cape Cod Voice is that papers can successfully tell thuggish
Voice lawyers to go screw themselves and live to brag about it. When
papers using the word "voice" in their titles have punched the
Village Voice Media shark on its nose, it has swam away more than once.
Meanwhile, as
Voice Media lawyers no doubt continue to size up new targets, Fran
Reichenbach is still weighing her options in Beachwood Canyon.
"I’m a fighter," she says. "I don’t have much money,
but the people [here] are behind my paper. They’re horrified by the Village
Voice’s behavior."
Is she at least
flattered that Village Voice Media singled out her little project from
all of the other "voices" in the country?
"It’s
still hard to grasp their perception of us as competition. If we changed
our name to the Beachwood Times, would we pose a threat to the New
York Times?"
It’s a good
question, and a funny one. Just don’t tell that to the Voice legal
team at Kay & Boose. Their client is very powerful and very famous.
According to their sales kit, they’ve even won a Pulitzer. |